The prospects for “global health”: debating the alternatives
Short background on the People's Health Movement– PHM (Alexis Benos). Many people in Europe are somehow linked to the PHM, but the majority of them work in the South of the world and not as much in the EU itself.
Narendra Gupta clarifies the three main activities that PHM is carrying out worldwide at the moment:
- campaigning for the right to health care
- IPHU
- publication of the Global Health Watch (two reports already published; third in process)
Basic PHM documents: People's Charter For Health; The Cuenca Declaration. A draft for a right to health bill has been elaborated, but many aspects need to be still defined before it is made available. More information at www.phmovement.org.
After a brief self introduction (see attached file “Berlin_PHM meeting_participants.xls” for contacts' details), each participant stated his/her expectations for the meeting and for networking, as well as his/her potential contributions. These statements are summarized in the following table:
|
EXPECTATIONS
|
CONTRIBUTIONS
|
|
|
After a plenary discussion, the group split into three working groups in order to address the main issues that had emerged:
- GLOBAL HEALTH EDUCATION (GHE)
- share experiences, perspectives, materials, training opportunities, academic resources, projects... fulfil the “responsibility” of being academics
- possibly agree on a common curriculum for GHE (separate courses or integration in the curriculum?)
- issues we agree on:
- GH is NOT Tropical Medicine (...but what exactly is GH?)
- GHE should be student-centred
- GHE should involve fields other than the medical one
- GHE should involve civil society
- GH is NOT Tropical Medicine (...but what exactly is GH?)
- ideas to be developed/implemented:
- summer school (or other kind of common training program that we could jointly develop) on GH
- “adopt” a scientific journal, possibly open access, in order to publish papers on GHE (options: Globalization and Health; International Health)
- write an open letter to Richard Horton, editor of The Lancet, in order to ask for help in opening a transparent debate on a GHE agenda
- hold a specific session on GHE during the next meeting of this PHM EU network
- summer school (or other kind of common training program that we could jointly develop) on GH
- feedback to be circulated as soon as possible and next immediate steps:
- the document “European Academic Alliance for Global Health – Preparatory Meeting, 10.03.2010” will be circulated among the whole group, in order to receive comments; Oliver Johnson, who is in touch with a couple of people from the Alliance, will reach them in order to start a dialogue, present our network and understand whether there is a chance for further collaboration (if possible, some representatives of the Alliance will be invited to our next meeting)
- the document “European Academic Alliance for Global Health – Preparatory Meeting, 10.03.2010” will be circulated among the whole group, in order to receive comments; Oliver Johnson, who is in touch with a couple of people from the Alliance, will reach them in order to start a dialogue, present our network and understand whether there is a chance for further collaboration (if possible, some representatives of the Alliance will be invited to our next meeting)
- share experiences, perspectives, materials, training opportunities, academic resources, projects... fulfil the “responsibility” of being academics
- GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION IN EUROPE (“local structures”)
- working with people in local structures
- ensuring long-term projects
- for which goals do we need “new” medical ethics + health education?
- re-empowerment
- turning professionals from service providers to community workers (and vice-versa)
- exchange of experiences and models (north/south)
- develop non-commercial models
- re-empowerment
- working with people in local structures
- NETWORKING ACROSS EUROPE (“communication-networking-
advocacy”) - social networking needed, not just email list
- idea: create a platform (Elgg – open source social networking platform) + web space for exchanging information and for debate; people and organizations can create their profile and participate to the debate, suggest issues for advocacy, etc.
- in each country there should be a “focal point”, in order to do gate keeping and avoid that too many people access the platform (restrict to PHM affiliates?)
- English will be the common language, at least in the beginning
- Sebastian (Heidelberg) and Ardigò (Bologna) will further develop these concept ideas and present a prototype platform to the group
- social networking needed, not just email list
Afterwards, the three groups met again and a person from each group reported to the plenary. We then decided that the group from Bologna should be in charge of sending a report of the meeting and administering the mailing list in this first phase. Andreas Wulf will explore the possibility of a next meeting in Berlin at the beginning of December. Everybody agrees that we should meet again quite soon, possibly having more time to discuss in depth the issues that we started identifying and that are of common interest.
NOTE: people who want to receive more information can write to the following address: csi.unibo[at]gmail.com

